Which of Dyson’s 2026 Vacuum Models Is the Best?

Dyson’s vacuum lineup has a whole new look these days, but that doesn’t necessarily make it easier to decide if you’re looking to buy one.

The Dyson V16 Piston Animal ($980), V10 Konical ($500), and V8 Cyclone ($400) arrived to change up Dyson’s cordless vacuum options. The older V15 Detect ($650) and Gen5Detect ($800) are also still available and great vacuums, which raises the question: Should you upgrade? Which Dyson model is worth the cash with so many options (and widely ranging price points) to choose from?

I tested all five of these vacuums against each other in a series of tests to see which ones stood out among the pack. The two overall winners? The Gen5Detect was the number one winner, with the V16 Piston Animal right behind it, and the V10 Konical coming up third even though it’s a much cheaper option. Read on to find out which model did best in each test, what the stats look like for each Dyson vacuum, and how I scored the final results.

Love WIRED? Add us as a preferred source on Google to see more of us.

A Quick Dyson Vacuum Rundown

Dyson’s naming convention is fun, and the numbers usually represent which models are more powerful or offer better accessories, but not always. Most of its vacuums have the V name, which, to my best guess, simply stands for “vacuum.” The numbers aren’t always in order of release and usually reflect a vacuum’s power level and capabilities. The V10 and V8 have the same power level but different heads, for example, while the V16 is more powerful than the V15. But not all vacuums are named the same; the Gen5Detect has a different name entirely, and falls in between the V15 and V16 when it comes to suction power and price tag.

Here’s a quick chart to understand the power levels and compatible accessories that differentiate each vacuum from the other. You might also spot things like “Plus” or “Total” when you’re shopping for a Dyson vacuum, and that usually reflects the attachments included with the vacuum.

This gives you a pretty easy look at what you’re getting for each model. As the models increase in number (both in the name and in the price tag), the vacuum usually gains more accessories or cleaner heads, more air watts of suction power, and sometimes the option to add the Submarine wet cleaner head on for an additional price, or future compatibility with Dyson’s Auto-empty Dok station that’s coming out soon.

The Digital Motorbar and All Floor Cones cleaner heads are both compatible with soft and hard floors, which is why sometimes it’s the only head included. More expensive Dyson models will also include the Fluffy Optic cleaner head, which is designed specifically for hard floors and has an illuminated light to help you spot dust and debris. The All Floor Cones cleaner head includes a light too, so you’re able to get that feature on both the V16 and V10 without switching heads.

Here are the tests I ran for each vacuum, and which ones did best—and worst.

Sand Test

BEST: V10 Konical ($500)

WORST: V8 Cyclone ($400)

I tested all five Dyson models on a small black rug onto which I poured fine, white sand to see how well it was vacuumed up. The best was the V10 Konical, followed by the V15 Detect. Both left a small trail of sand behind in different spots, which makes sense since they have different head designs, but the V10’s trail was smaller than the V15’s, with a small line in the middle compared to the larger trail the V15 had on its right side.

The V8, meanwhile, stalled entirely when I tried to use it on the rug and couldn’t vacuum up sand whatsoever. It weirdly seemed to have an issue with the thin rug, even though equally or more powerful vacuums were able to vacuum on it.

Both Gen5Detect and V16 Piston Animal were able to vacuum on the thin rug, but the stronger suction also kept trying to take the rug with it, giving both mixed results and leaving a lot of sand behind on each pass. I retested both of these on a thicker rug in case the suction level wasn’t a match for the thin rug, and both did much better, but the Gen5Detect did the best, getting every bit of sand in one swoop. The V16 got most of its sand, but pushed some sand into a little pile in front of itself.

Cereal Test

BEST: Gen5Detect ($800)

WORST: None

When I last did a cereal test, I used a cornflake-style cereal. This time I switched to the cereal I know many parents like myself are much more likely to have all over the floors: Cheerios. I crushed up several in my hand and dropped those along with full Cheerios onto my thicker living room rug. Overall, every Dyson did a good job cleaning this up on the first pass.

The results on this one had pretty minimal differences for these models. The V8, V10, and V15 Detect all usually got the Cheerios and pieces on the first run, sending one to three pieces flying while it did so, but not so far away you wouldn’t get to vacuum them up. The Gen5Detect sent nothing flying, though, so it pulls slightly ahead. The V16 sent only a single tiny piece flying forward. But it was right behind the Gen5Detect out of these Dyson models.

Litter Test

BEST: Gen5Detect ($800)

WORST: V8 Cyclone ($400)

Next, I tested these vacuums against a thing I vacuum the most off my vinyl plank floors: cat litter. For this test, since it was on a hard surface instead of a rug, I switched the vacuums’ heads to the Fluffy Optic cleaner head when available. That’s only on the V15, V16, and Gen5Detect, so those heads changed while the other two models still used the Digital Motorbar (V8) or the All Floor Cones (V10) heads they came with.

It’s no surprise that the two standouts both had a Fluffy Optic head. The Gen5Detect left the cleanest floor behind, with not a spec of litter dust to be found from the vacuum’s illuminated light after a single pass. The V16 Piston Animal mostly did well, leaving no litter behind, but it did push a small amount of litter in front of itself, similar to the sand test. This only happened in a pass of extremely thick litter, so more day-to-day litter cleanup shouldn’t have this issue. Still, the Gen5Detect pulls slightly ahead once again.

The V15 is right behind these two, but left a little dust behind that I could see with the Fluffy Optic’s headlight (though no large pieces, and it looked just as clean to the naked eye). Meanwhile, the V10 Konical did fine enough, but needed two passes to get all the debris. The V8 landed last after it pulled a similar move when vacuuming sand and simply pushed the litter into a pile in front of itself, so I then had to move the vacuum on top of and around to vacuum it up, and it took a few passes to do so.

Handheld Test

BEST: V16 Piston Animal ($980) and Gen5Detect ($800)

WORST: V15 Detect ($650)

Dyson’s vacuums function nicely as a handheld vacuum, no matter the model. I tested all five models on my carpeted stairs, and I’d recommend any one of them if that’s a big use in your household. The V16 and Gen5Detect pull ahead for me because you can really feel the higher suction at work when you’re in handheld mode, and both vacuums showed serious results afterward of dustbins filled with new hair and dust. Especially as a cat owner and a parent of a small child, the carpeted stairs around my house have a lot of debris worked into them. Plus, both of these vacuums have built-in crevice tools you can use in handheld mode, but the V16’s will always stay attached, while you need to remove the Gen5’s to attach the head directly to the handheld motor.

The V15 also did a fine job, but it felt like it was gliding over my stairs rather than locking into the carpet like the other Dyson vacuums. Even the V8 and V10 with lower power levels felt more suctioned into my carpet than the V15 did for me during my handheld stair testing. Both those cheaper models fell into the runner-up range for me with this test.

Carpet and Rug Test

BEST: Gen5Detect ($800) and V10 Konical ($500)

WORST: V15 Detect ($650)

Originally, I tested an early release version of the V16 Piston Animal that had some clogging issues on carpet. But after getting a current release model, the V16 did much better overall. Both the V16 and the Gen5Detect did an impressive job on my carpets and rugs, and pulled an impressive amount of cat hair and dust out of my recently vacuumed carpets. These both have different heads, but the powerful suction really comes into play on carpet more than anywhere else, especially if you have pets.

Meanwhile, the V10 Konical has the All Floor Cones cleaner head that glided nicely on carpet. The V10’s head was a little easier to push around than the Digital Motorbar head (which both the V8 and V15 have) on rugs. The V8 Cyclone took the most effort to push around on my rug, but moved much better on carpet.

The V15 Detect was similar, but unlike the rest of these vacuums, it has a trigger button instead of a power button. That means you have to keep that engaged the entire time when doing a longer vacuuming session. The rest of these vacuums have a power button you click instead, so I don’t love the trigger for longer vacuuming sessions. If you’re a big vacuumer or have a home with a large amount of carpet, you’re going to want a power button, and likely one of the higher-suction vacuums.

Which One Wins?

The results, as you can tell above, are a little murky. The higher-suction vacuums usually took home the prize in most categories, but the V10 Konical was a surprisingly solid all-around performer. To find my winner, I put all of my tests and Dyson models into a chart and scored them on a 1 to 4 point scale, allowing 4 points if the vacuum did the best, 1 if the worst, and a 2 or 3 depending on how middle-of-the-road the results were. One vacuum had a nice lead with a near-perfect score of 19 points.

The biggest standout from these tests was the Gen5Detect. It came out of these tests with a near-perfect score after the five rounds of testing. It does a great job with its level of powerful suction, and it transitions well between most kinds of debris. As a pet owner, I especially like it for carpet, since the 280 air watts do a great job pulling out hair and pet dander from deep in the carpet. I’ve actually filled up this vacuum’s debris tank before after vacuuming only a few days before with a weaker option.

It’s one of the most expensive for a reason, and comes with more attachments than any other model. I do find myself regularly grabbing the Fluffy Optic head for vacuuming my hard floors, which cover many square feet of my home. If you’re looking to really splurge on the best vacuum, this is still the one to get.

The only downside is compatibility with Dyson’s bigger attachments, namely a mop head or docking station. It doesn’t have a Submarine option like the V16 or V15, and Dyson’s Auto-empty Dok won’t work with this model. But if you aren’t worried about add-ons, this is the vacuum to buy. It’s had better sales since the launch of the new models, too.

The Runner-Up

The V16 Piston Animal’s powerful 315 air watts of suction did pretty well on almost every test. My only issue with this vacuum compared to the Gen5Detect is that it was more likely to push small debris (in my tests, both sand and litter) into a pile in front of itself if you were vacuuming a large spill. Gen5Detect did better all around, but the V16 Piston Animal stayed close behind that hiccup.

It’s a powerful all-around vacuum with some nice design upgrades to make it a little easier to use. This newer model has a release below the vacuum motor to release the cleaner head without having to bend down, and built-in crevice tools to both the handheld motor and the long wand that makes up the middle of the device. There’s also a compressor to help push dust out of the dustbin, and it’ll be compatible with Dyson’s upcoming self-emptying docking station. There’s also a Submarine version ($1,100) so you can use this vacuum as a mop, too.

It has some nice quality-of-life upgrades, but it’s really expensive. I’d recommend it if you know you also want to invest in the mop head and docking station; otherwise, just get the Gen5Detect.

One of the best overall performers is nearly half the price of my winners. The Dyson V10 Konical never once scored in last place, and was especially comfortable to use on carpets and rugs with the new cleaner head design. It did much better than the more expensive and powerful Gen5Detect and V15 Detect when vacuuming up sand, and I found it more comfortable to push around than the Digital Motorbar head on the V15 and V8 when it came to vacuuming a low-pile rug.

It didn’t do as well on hard floors, but it didn’t do poorly, either. This cheaper model comes with just the single head, but if you don’t want to spend the better part of a grand, I’d rather only have this head than the Digital Motorbar head. The All Floor Cones cleaner head also has a built-in light, which you won’t get on cheaper or older models. Plus, it’ll be compatible with the self-emptying docking station Dyson has coming out soon. For the price point, it’s a fantastic buy.

Also Consider: The Upgrade Options

BEST: V16 Piston Animal Submarine ($1,100) and V10 Konical with Auto-empty Dok ($650)

WORST: V8 Cyclone ($400) and Gen5Detect ($800)

I’m putting this section after the testing because if you’re just looking for a good vacuum, this might not be relevant for you. But there are some interesting upgrades with certain Dyson models you might want to consider, which might sway you toward a certain model over the testing aspects—like if you want a stick vacuum that can work with a self-emptying docking station, or one that can double as a mop. Not all of Dyson’s vacuums can do these things, but some of them can—and one can do both.

Both the V16 Piston Animal and the V15 Detect have a Submarine variant (that retail for $1,100 and $750, respectively) that will give you the Submarine head along with the rest of the vacuum accessories. They have slightly different designs, but both are a wet roller head that stores both clean and dirty water while being powered by the motor in the rest of the vacuum. Former WIRED reviewer Adrienne So loved the Submarine version of the V15, and I’ve been really impressed by the V16’s version as well.

If you hate emptying your cordless vacuum, there’s an add-on for that, too. You can buy the V10 Konical now with Dyson’s new Auto-emptying Dok that can hold up to 60 days of debris. It’s a great add-on I’ve tried with other vacuums like Shark and Tineco and loved because it keeps my vacuum charged and upright, and it stores accessories as well. Dyson has mentioned launching one of these for the V16 in the future, but I’m not sure when that could come to fruition.

If I were to assign points based on these, the V16 Piston Animal ties with the Gen5Detect after getting its add-on while the Gen5Detect has none since it has neither of these additions, and once its own docking station arrives it would pull into first. The V10 Konical remains close behind. It’s up to you whether these add-ons make it worth buying, or if you want to choose the models that actually performed best for what you need vacuumed most.

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.