It’s difficult to measure the quality of the best webcams without evaluating them side by side. Every webcam I’ve ever tested handles light differently, and subtle variations in a room—like the location of your windows and the colors of your walls—can change your perception of a webcam’s capabilities.
So, when given the task of declaring one webcam winner, I realized I really needed to test all of them at the same time under the exact same lighting conditions. So, that’s what I did. After many rounds of testing and using these webcams in my daily life, which just happens to include a very poorly lit home office, I came across a few gems that stood out from the rest.
Want more home-office recommendations? Check out our guide to the Best Printer for Every Home Office Need, the Best Standing Desks, and the Best Office Chairs.
Updated August 2026: I’ve added testing information about the Dell Pro 5 and Dell Pro 7 webcams. I’ve also added new photos to some existing recommended products.
Love WIRED? Add us as a preferred source on Google to see more of us.
The Single Best Webcam
After testing more than 15 webcams, I found a clear winner for the best image quality, microphone, and design: the Insta360 Link 2C Pro ($200). It’s remarkably compact and light, allowing it to work just as well on a laptop as on a monitor. That flexibility alone lends the webcam a uniquely practical design that most other webcams can’t compete with. The Logitech MX Brio (my previous pick for best overall webcam) is almost three times heavier.
The Insta360 Link 2C Pro magnetizes to its strong aluminum mount, and I never worried about it falling back, even with the weight of the USB-C cable pulling on it. This also makes its panning adjustments super-smooth. It’s surprising how many webcams struggle with this very simple motion, but it’s perhaps the result of many mounts being plastic—including the Logitech MX Brio. Because the Insta360 is magnetic, it can also stick to any other metal surface, which can be convenient if you’re looking to shoot from a different angle.
In terms of image quality, no webcam at this price delivers lowlight performance on par with the Insta360 2C Pro. Right out of the box, without even tweaking any settings, I was impressed by its ability to handle harsh light. Like all the cameras, I tested it in some poor conditions, including under overhead office lighting and being backlit. The webcam handled these scenarios better than its competitors. It avoided blowing out the highlights and could deliver as much detail in the image as possible, even compared to more expensive webcams, like the Obsbot Tiny 3 ($349).
I also noticed its very natural image-processing contrast compared to options like the Logitech MX Brio, which tended to crush blacks. Under better lighting, the sharpness of the image really stood out. Thanks to that large 1/1.3-inch CMOS sensor, objects in the background fall out of focus in a natural bokeh effect. It mimics the look of a DLSR better than any camera I tested. Other webcams look flat by comparison.
It’s not perfect—no webcam is. Sometimes there’s a bit too much processing and smoothing for my taste, especially in some of the details around the face. And out of the box, the colors skew a bit cool. The easy-to-use software makes adjusting these issues easy, but it’s something to be aware of nonetheless. Hopefully, by now, you’ll be convinced that there’s little reason to buy the Logitech MX Brio over the Insta360 2C Pro. Logitech has a lot of brand equity in the world of webcams, but considering both models retail for $200, Insta360 definitely has the superior product.
The standard Insta360 Link 2C ($150) is also a strong option. It’s $50 cheaper, with a slightly smaller sensor and narrower aperture, resulting in worse low-light performance. I noticed that it introduced more noise, especially in areas of high contrast, such as along my hairline. But let’s be real: Though you can hunt down the differences between these two webcams, the standard Link 2C still punches above its weight for the price.
One of the biggest disadvantages of the non-Pro model, though, is in microphone quality. The Insta360 2C is more in line with other webcams I tested. It uses just a single microphone and lacks the ability to pick up the deeper frequencies in my voice, whereas the 2C Pro uses a dual-microphone beam-forming system that does a far better job capturing the fuller spectrum. I still think that the Insta360 Link 2C is one of the best options at around $150, though, handily beating out models like the Razer Kiyo V2 and Logitech Brio 4K.
Cheap Webcams That Get the Job Done
Proceed very carefully with the following recommendations. That’s especially true if you are working from a laptop with a built-in camera or already have a decent webcam. In general, I suggest dishing out some extra cash for one of the more premium options listed above, or buying a light to help your existing camera work better. Even a simple lighting accessory, like the $70 Logitech Litra Glow, will dramatically improve the quality of your video calls more effectively than buying a budget webcam.
That said, if you’re using an external monitor and need a budget-friendly webcam to pair with it, there are a couple of decent options to consider. The Anker PowerConf C200 ($66) is the best of the bunch that I’ve tested. It has issues, such as the built-in mount, which can’t swivel left or right. It also doesn’t grip the monitor as effectively as I’d want. While the 5-megapixel camera can’t compare with the larger sensors in the more premium webcams, the image quality is decent enough, especially if your room has nice light and you don’t mind tweaking the picture quality in the software.
I’d also hesitantly recommend the Logitech Brio 300 ($60). Like the C200, it has a number of deficiencies. On this model, those drawbacks include an unappealing sticky pad built into the integrated mount and the built-in cable. The microphone also won’t be much of an upgrade over the ones built into MacBooks, though it’s still better than built-in mics on many of the Windows laptops I’ve tested. I also don’t like that the Brio 300 has a fixed 70-degree field-of-view, which gives it a smaller framing than all the other webcams I’ve tried.
That’s a lot of complaints, I know. But if you just need something simple and “good enough,” the Logitech Brio 300 will do and certainly has better lowlight performance over an older option, like the Logitech C920. If you have decent lighting in your room, the Brio 300 will still be an upgrade over your laptop’s webcam in terms of image quality.
For options that ring up for something between the $60 of my budget picks and the $150 of my top picks, check the honorable mentions below. That said, I haven’t encountered a $100-range webcam that actually feels like it’s worth the money—or the extra money beyond a budget recommendation. I’m curious if the Anker AnkerWerk C310 $100—the 4K upgrade over the C200 from a few years ago—will change my mind when I test it soon. It comes in right at $100 and has a larger 1/2.5-inch sensor.
The Best PTZ Webcams
PTZ, also known as pan-tilt-zoom webcams, are far more versatile than a standard webcam. Essentially, the camera sits on a gimbal and can follow you around a room using face-tracking technology. These cameras can pan far to the left or right, tilt up and down, and use a digital zoom. That’s a pretty advanced feature set, and likely not the kind of thing most people shopping for a webcam really need. But if you happen to use your webcam for streaming, giving presentations, teaching courses, or really anything else that involves staying on camera while moving about your room, you could probably benefit from one. Even if you don’t need one, you’ll probably get a kick out of just experimenting with its capabilities.
There are a couple of impressive PTZ options, but the best is the Obsbot Tiny 3 ($349), which is also the most expensive webcam I tested. While its price tag is likely more than what most people want to spend on a webcam, the camera did produce the overall best color accuracy, replicating real-life color without looking overprocessed. Its image quality is better than any other webcam I tested—even beyond what the Insta360 cameras can do. I still prefer the lowlight performance of the Insta360 cameras, but the Obsbot Tiny 3’s colors are more natural. It can even shoot in 120 frames per second in 1080p, though I’m not sure quite what the use case is for that.
Obsbot has a cheaper version as well, the Obsbot Tiny 3 Lite ($199), which very well may be the PTZ webcam that most people should buy, in light of the lower price. It’s a minor step down in image quality, as it uses a small camera sensor. The most notable trade-offs, though, are that you don’t get as much of that natural background blur, and the lowlight performance isn’t as strong. But it’s one of the most affordable ways to get the PTZ features without too much of a downgrade in quality. (And really, the PTZ features are why you’d buy these cameras anyway.)
In its latest release, Obsbot has introduced lots of interesting new ways to use AI to control the gimbal, like tracking objects, following your voice, and giving you a few audio modes for specific use cases. There’s even a feature that allows you to use preset voice commands to control the gimbal, such as choosing between preset angles or zooming in. All of the previous (and extensive) software features are still around, too. Among others, those features include setup for customizable preset angles, desk mode, and multiple head-tracking speeds. There’s tons to play around with, making PTZ cameras fun in addition to being useful.
If you like the design of the Insta360, though, the company has a PTZ version of the Link 2C Pro that I recommended above. The Insta360 Link 2 Pro ($249) has the exact same picture and microphone quality as the 2C, but with the additional capability of being able to pan, tilt, and zoom. (There’s also a cheaper model, the Insta360 Link 2 ($196).) The main benefit it has over the Obsbot Tiny 3 is that it’s a full $100 cheaper. That’s significant, even if the color accuracy isn’t quite as strong on the more affordable model. For what it’s worth, I preferred the way Link 2 Pro handled the lowlight scenarios over the Obsbot Tiny 3. The Tiny 3 was definitely overexposed right out of the box.
Though the Insta360 Link 2 Pro is not quite as full-featured as the Obsbot cameras in terms of AI trickery, I do like that you can control the gimbal using your phone to make adjustments. Instead of having to rely solely on the desktop software or voice commands, the Insta360 cameras let you quickly pull up controls in a browser on your phone after scanning the QR code, which is super handy.
Before You Buy, Try Using Your Smartphone
You may not need a dedicated webcam at all. It’s actually really easy to use your smartphone’s cameras as a webcam instead. In fact, your smartphone is usually far superior to a webcam. Recent iPhones, for example, have a feature called Continuity Camera, which works with certain MacBooks and allows you to wirelessly use the iPhone’s camera as a webcam. Apple even sells a Belkin mount ($30) that lets you hang your iPhone off the top of your MacBook or external monitor for the full effect.
-SOURCE-Julian-Chokkattu.jpg)
Photograph: Julian Chokkattu
Belkin
iPhone Mount With MagSafe for MacBooks
Google Pixel phones also now feature wired webcam support. To use it, plug in a Pixel to your computer and choose the webcam option you want. You’ll just need a tripod to keep it propped up; something like this Joby GripTight will do the job.
Don’t have either of these smartphones? Don’t fret. We have a full guide on How to Use Your Smartphone as a Webcam, complete with multiple methods, no matter which PC or phone you own. We also have a guide for setting up a professional camera as a webcam.
How to Improve Your Webcam
An easy way to improve your existing webcam is to add a light source. Webcams have small camera sensors, so they often need a lot of light to deliver good results. One that I’d recommend is the Lume Cube Mini LED Panel ($70). It’s simple to use, allowing you to adjust the brightness and the color temperature to match your room’s lighting. It can either use battery power, or you can leave it plugged in via the USB-C cable to run for however long you want. Its two quarter-inch threads mean you can use any tripod or light stand to mount it on your desk. It also comes with a diffuser to soften the light when it illuminates your face. For more lighting options, check our Home Video Gear guide.
Webcams also typically have poor microphones. The higher-end webcams typically have better microphones that’ll do the job, but you’ll still probably sound tinny. If you own a MacBook Pro, you may find that its mics actually sound better than the built-in mic in the webcam. Videoconferencing apps let you choose which mic you want to use, so just because you have a separate webcam doesn’t mean you have to use its built-in mic.
Another option is to upgrade to a USB mic like the Logitech Blue Yeti Nano USB Mic ($120). Logitech microphones are the standard-bearers in the world of USB microphones; the Nano packs everything most people need, but in a smaller footprint. Plug it into your computer, and once you choose this mic in your video-calling settings as the default, you’ll immediately start hearing compliments from people on the other end. Read our Best USB Mics guide for more details.
Most videoconferencing software cap the resolution at 1080p for bandwidth purposes, so a 4K webcam may not be necessary at all. However, almost all 4K webcams come with software that lets you crop in or reframe the image, allowing you to, say, move something in the background of your home office out of frame. Most importantly, most 4K webcams will produce better image quality in general. They’re more expensive, but if you can afford one, it’ll deliver the best-looking feed for video calls.
It’s also important to consider that 4K webcams often shoot at 30 frames per second, but usually also offer 1080p at 60 frames per second. I should note, though, that while 4K cameras often can shoot in 1080p, they are being downsampled and can sometimes result in artifacts or messy details.
Understanding Megapixels, Resolutions, and Sensors
A webcam’s picture quality matters most, but there are a number of camera specs that play into it. For starters, what we usually just call “resolution” is the pixel count of the final image, usually either 1080p, 1440p, or 4K. The sharpness of this final image is important, but it doesn’t alone tell the whole story on image quality.
The camera sensor itself also has a resolution, usually referred to in megapixels, which is just the total number of pixels (rather than resolution, which uses a width by height dimension). More megapixels can produce higher-quality images, but the physical size of the sensor is also important. A larger sensor with a lower megapixel count will often result in better images. Sensors also often have confusing labels attached to them. But, as a guiding principle, the bigger sensor, the better. So, a 1/1.3-inch sensor (which is as large as webcam sensors get right now) is better than a 1/2-inch sensor.
There are, of course, other important parts of cameras, such as the aperture of the lens, which controls how much light the camera captures and can affect lowlight performance. Most webcams have an aperture of f/2.0, but some models that have better lowlight performance, like the Insta360 Link 2C Pro, have a wider f/1.9 aperture.
Lastly, the image processing has a lot to do with the final quality of the image. Webcams these days use lots of AI-based image processing to sharpen and balance the image around your face, including filtering out noise and smoothing out skin tone. Most of us want this to look as natural as possible, and there’s no question that some webcams are too heavy-handed.
Do Webcams Work With Laptops?
Yes, most webcams work just fine with laptops. Most laptops don’t high-quality internal webcams, so any one of these webcams should improve the image quality. Most of the mounts that come with these webcams, however, are designed for external monitors. I’ve found that while that most can rest on a laptop lid just fine, they’re not tightly secured as they would be on an external monitor. But obviously, the smaller the camera the better for a laptop, which is why the Insta360 cameras work well.
Other Good Webcams I Tested
Photograph: Luke Larsen
Dell Pro 5 for $120: Not everyone wants to spend $150 or $200 on a webcam, and there’s a surprising lack of good options closer to $100. The Dell Pro 5 is decent, and it comes with Windows Hello. It’s not 4K (up to 1440p instead), but image quality is nice enough for the price, especially if you’re willing to make some tweaks to the brightness and contrast. The magnetic mount is nice too, but it’s unfortunate that it comes with a built-in USB-A cable rather than a detachable one.
YoloCam S3 for $199: I’ve seen this one promoted all over social media, and I’m happy to report that I like its ability to easily shoot in portrait. Just flip it around on its magnetic stand, and you’re instantly shooting social media-ready content. Its lowlight performance isn’t as strong as other options at this price, however, and it was buggy out of the box when I tested across multiple devices. But it’s still one of the strongest competitor to the Insta360 Link 2C Pro of anything I tested.
Razer Kiyo V2 for $113: I love the click of the physical shutter closing, but the lowlight performance was a bit disappointing, especially for how large of a device this is. The new white colorway that I tested is pretty, though, and for the price, the image quality isn’t bad. The Razer Kiyo Pro Ultra that creates the most natural bokeh effect is also in this line, but it also costs $400.
Obsbot Meet 2
Photograph: Luke Larsen
Obsbot Meet 2 for $129: This is, by far, the smallest and lightest webcam I tested, making it a solid option for laptop users. That compact size also means a smaller sensor, though lowlight performance wasn’t its strong suit. I’d still take this over the Logitech Brio 500 (which is currently out of stock). There’s also the 1080p Obsbot Meet SE ($69) that I plan to test in the future as a midrange option.
Logitech MX Brio for $200: It produces decent 4K image quality, but for the price, I prefer the Insta360 Link 2C Pro’s image processing, lowlight performance, and microphone quality.
Don’t Bother With These Webcams
Dell Pro 7 for $200: This one didn’t cut it for the price. I went in with high hopes, given the specs and hardware inside. But comparing this device to something like the Insta360 Link 2C Pro (or even Link 2C) yields results that are night and day in terms of image quality, microphone clarity, and focus speed.
Logitech C920 for $68: It’s hard to believe this old webcam is still being sold and purchased, despite being 14 years old. It was the go-to webcam for many, many years, but it’s not worth buying in 2026. You’ll also see variants of it out there, such as the C920x, C920S, and C920e, but none are meaningful improvements on the basic image quality.
Logitech 4K Brio
Photograph: Luke Larsen
Emeet SmartCam S800 for $70: Getting a 4K resolution at this price is tempting, but the out-of-the-box color accuracy is rough, producing an overly green image. This can be tweaked in the software, but I also found that it has an over-sharpened effect that gave it a fake digital effect. I just couldn’t get this to look how I wanted.
Logitech 4K Brio for $170: It’s too expensive for the quality, especially with how oversaturated the colors look. It is, however, one of the only webcams that supports Windows Hello facial authentication.
Emeet Pixy for $90: This PTZ webcam is undeniably cute, resembling a little robot friend hanging out on your monitor. It actually uses two cameras to speed up autofocus and support AI features. The autofocus is fast, but I didn’t notice it functioning any quicker than other high-end cameras. The lowlight performance really suffers, though, the microphone is awful, and it’s a far larger PTZ webcam than the others on the list.
Logitech Brio 500
Logitech Brio 500 for $130: This isn’t a bad webcam per se, but it’s just not worth $130. I don’t like the integrated mount or cable, and the lowlight performance can’t compete. You can spend even more on the Brio 505, which is the same camera, except it comes with a removable USB-C cable.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.
