EletiofeAmaju Pinnick vs Davido: Court Declines Singer’s Application For...

Amaju Pinnick vs Davido: Court Declines Singer’s Application For Stay Of Proceedings

-

- Advertisment -

The application filed by Afrobeats star, Davido seeking a stay of proceedings in the N2 billion suit filed against him by Brownhill Investment Company Limited owned by former NFF president, Amaju Pinnick, over the annual ‘Warri Again Concert, has been rejected by a Delta State High Court sitting in Effurun.

Amaju’s company filed the lawsuit against Davido after he failed to perform at a concert in Warri which he was fully paid for. The company is asking the court to award N2 billion as general damages against Davido.The company is also asking the court for N150 million as legal and professional fees and an additional N30 million as the cost of filing the suit.

Defendants in the suit are David Adeleke a.k.a “Davido,” and his music label, Davido Music Worldwide Limited.

Vanguard reports that at the hearing in the matter recently, Davido’s counsel, Norrison Quakers, SAN, informed the court that there was a pending appeal and that the defendants had filed a motion for a stay of proceedings. Quakers further told the court that the defendants had been served with a copy of the claimant’s counter affidavit to the said motion for stay.

However, he applied to withdraw the motion and submitted that the Court of Appeal had become seized with authority over the proceedings pending before the lower court.

The counsel to Amaju’s company, Kelechi Onwuegbuchulem, did not oppose the application to withdraw the motion and the court granted the same accordingly.

The court in a bench ruling upheld the claimant’s argument and held that until an order staying further proceedings is obtained from the Court of Appeal, the High Court will continue with proceedings in the case.

The court also granted the motion on notice seeking to regularize the Amaju’s company’s reply to the statement of defence and directed that Pre-Trial Conference, PTC, forms be filed within 14 days in line with the rules of the court. The court adjourned the case to March 21, 2024, for a pre-trial conference.

Recall that Davido had, in his preliminary objection challenged the jurisdiction of the court, because the case ought not to take place in Effurun

But the court in its ruling dismissed the preliminary objection.
 

Latest news

Retrospec Joe Rev 2 Review (2026): Putting the ‘Joy’ in Joyride

The entry-level Joe Rev was created in this same spirit—a full-sized, BMX-inspired frame with fun color options (electric blue,...

This Beautifully Weird Necklace Is Secretly a USB Drive

I’m already growing hoarse in Golden Gate Park as Charli XCX takes the stage at a San Francisco music...

6 Best Apple Watch Accessories to Upgrade Your Watch (2026)

If you have an iPhone, you've probably considered buying an Apple Watch—and with good reason. It's the best smartwatch...

Instapaper, the Original Read-It-Later App, Just Got a Huge Upgrade

As you've no doubt noticed, there's a lot to read on the internet. Vast numbers of new articles are...
- Advertisement -

Auk Mini 2 Indoor Smart Garden Review: Better Where It Counts

Review: Auk Mini 2 Indoor Smart GardenAuk’s popular indoor herb garden gets thoughtful upgrades without changing what already worked.Courtesy...

Integrated Indigo Bags Agency of the Year at the 2026 National Spokespersons Awards

Integrated Indigo Limited, a full-service marketing...

Must read

Retrospec Joe Rev 2 Review (2026): Putting the ‘Joy’ in Joyride

The entry-level Joe Rev was created in this same...

This Beautifully Weird Necklace Is Secretly a USB Drive

I’m already growing hoarse in Golden Gate Park as...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you