EletiofeAmaju Pinnick vs Davido: Court Declines Singer’s Application For...

Amaju Pinnick vs Davido: Court Declines Singer’s Application For Stay Of Proceedings

-

- Advertisment -

The application filed by Afrobeats star, Davido seeking a stay of proceedings in the N2 billion suit filed against him by Brownhill Investment Company Limited owned by former NFF president, Amaju Pinnick, over the annual ‘Warri Again Concert, has been rejected by a Delta State High Court sitting in Effurun.

Amaju’s company filed the lawsuit against Davido after he failed to perform at a concert in Warri which he was fully paid for. The company is asking the court to award N2 billion as general damages against Davido.The company is also asking the court for N150 million as legal and professional fees and an additional N30 million as the cost of filing the suit.

Defendants in the suit are David Adeleke a.k.a “Davido,” and his music label, Davido Music Worldwide Limited.

Vanguard reports that at the hearing in the matter recently, Davido’s counsel, Norrison Quakers, SAN, informed the court that there was a pending appeal and that the defendants had filed a motion for a stay of proceedings. Quakers further told the court that the defendants had been served with a copy of the claimant’s counter affidavit to the said motion for stay.

However, he applied to withdraw the motion and submitted that the Court of Appeal had become seized with authority over the proceedings pending before the lower court.

The counsel to Amaju’s company, Kelechi Onwuegbuchulem, did not oppose the application to withdraw the motion and the court granted the same accordingly.

The court in a bench ruling upheld the claimant’s argument and held that until an order staying further proceedings is obtained from the Court of Appeal, the High Court will continue with proceedings in the case.

The court also granted the motion on notice seeking to regularize the Amaju’s company’s reply to the statement of defence and directed that Pre-Trial Conference, PTC, forms be filed within 14 days in line with the rules of the court. The court adjourned the case to March 21, 2024, for a pre-trial conference.

Recall that Davido had, in his preliminary objection challenged the jurisdiction of the court, because the case ought not to take place in Effurun

But the court in its ruling dismissed the preliminary objection.
 

Latest news

Instagram’s New Instants App Is a Snapchat Clone for Thirst Traps

Meta launched a new app on Wednesday, called Instants, that integrates with existing Instagram accounts and allows users to...

What It Will Take to Make AI Sustainable

Building AI sustainably seems like a pipe dream as tech giants that previously made promises to cut emissions have...

DHS Plans Experiment Running ‘Reconnaissance’ Drones Along the US-Canada Border

The US Department of Homeland Security, in collaboration with the Defense Research and Development Canada, is looking to send...

Overworked AI Agents Turn Marxist, Researchers Find

The fact that artificial intelligence is automating away people’s jobs and making a few tech companies absurdly rich is...
- Advertisement -

OpenAI Brings Its Ass to Court

Wednesday’s episode of the Musk v. Altman trial kicked off with a unique proposition: OpenAI wanted to bring its...

From Daytona to the World Cup: Ivory Coast hopeful Yan Diomande's rapid rise has Europe's powerhouses circling

Yan Diomande’s career has accelerated at uncommon speed — from the obscurity of a small U.S. sports academy known...

Must read

Instagram’s New Instants App Is a Snapchat Clone for Thirst Traps

Meta launched a new app on Wednesday, called Instants,...

What It Will Take to Make AI Sustainable

Building AI sustainably seems like a pipe dream as...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you