EletiofeAmaju Pinnick vs Davido: Court Declines Singer’s Application For...

Amaju Pinnick vs Davido: Court Declines Singer’s Application For Stay Of Proceedings

-

- Advertisment -

The application filed by Afrobeats star, Davido seeking a stay of proceedings in the N2 billion suit filed against him by Brownhill Investment Company Limited owned by former NFF president, Amaju Pinnick, over the annual ‘Warri Again Concert, has been rejected by a Delta State High Court sitting in Effurun.

Amaju’s company filed the lawsuit against Davido after he failed to perform at a concert in Warri which he was fully paid for. The company is asking the court to award N2 billion as general damages against Davido.The company is also asking the court for N150 million as legal and professional fees and an additional N30 million as the cost of filing the suit.

Defendants in the suit are David Adeleke a.k.a “Davido,” and his music label, Davido Music Worldwide Limited.

Vanguard reports that at the hearing in the matter recently, Davido’s counsel, Norrison Quakers, SAN, informed the court that there was a pending appeal and that the defendants had filed a motion for a stay of proceedings. Quakers further told the court that the defendants had been served with a copy of the claimant’s counter affidavit to the said motion for stay.

However, he applied to withdraw the motion and submitted that the Court of Appeal had become seized with authority over the proceedings pending before the lower court.

The counsel to Amaju’s company, Kelechi Onwuegbuchulem, did not oppose the application to withdraw the motion and the court granted the same accordingly.

The court in a bench ruling upheld the claimant’s argument and held that until an order staying further proceedings is obtained from the Court of Appeal, the High Court will continue with proceedings in the case.

The court also granted the motion on notice seeking to regularize the Amaju’s company’s reply to the statement of defence and directed that Pre-Trial Conference, PTC, forms be filed within 14 days in line with the rules of the court. The court adjourned the case to March 21, 2024, for a pre-trial conference.

Recall that Davido had, in his preliminary objection challenged the jurisdiction of the court, because the case ought not to take place in Effurun

But the court in its ruling dismissed the preliminary objection.
 

Latest news

What The Heck Is This New Meta AI Photo Feature And Can I Turn It Off?

Have you ever wanted to animate your profile picture on Facebook? Or turn your latest Instagram upload into a...

Inside the Race to Develop a Test for the Rare Andes Hantavirus

As passengers return to the US from the cruise that saw a rare hantavirus outbreak, much of the country...

OnlyFans’ First-Gen Creators Are Retiring—and Some Are Begging You to Forget They Exist

On April 28, just before noon, Win White logged onto X and posted a series of messages to his...

Sony Bravia Theater Bar 5 Review: Basic Bar, Big Sound

Review: Sony Bravia Theater Bar 5The latest Bravia Theater soundbar strips away the nice-to-have extras, but its crisp and...
- Advertisement -

A Conspiracy Theory About QR Codes Has Led to Chaos Ahead of Georgia’s Midterms

QR codes are at the center of the latest conspiracy theory in Georgia’s elections. And it’s largely thanks to...

Meet the Sad Wives of AI

If i had to listen to another minute of my husband talking about Claude Code, I might have actually...

Must read

What The Heck Is This New Meta AI Photo Feature And Can I Turn It Off?

Have you ever wanted to animate your profile picture...

Inside the Race to Develop a Test for the Rare Andes Hantavirus

As passengers return to the US from the cruise...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you